apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>
Subject Re: APR 1.2.1
Date Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:39:03 GMT
Joe Orton wrote:

>On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:36:50PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>  
>
>>Branko Čibej wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Windows compiles with lots of unnecessary warnings (looks like nobody 
>>>ever tests on systems where sizeof(apr_size_t) < sizeof(apr_off_t), 
>>>      
>>>
>
>That property is certainly not unique to Windows, what are the warnings?  
>  
>
I posted them in my first response to this thread.

>>>and the tests don't pass:
>>>
>>>  * testfile::test_bigfprintf fails (Line 697: expected <8194>, but
>>>    saw <8192>)
>>>      
>>>
>That one at least looks like a genuine bug, though not a regression - 
>the Unix apr_file_printf() implementation was improved a while back to 
>cope properly with large strings, but Win32 has a copy of the old code.
>  
>
Indeed, you're right, STATUS mentions a test_file_info failure which 
seems to be gone. The very up-to-date state of STATUS confused me...

-- Brane


Mime
View raw message