apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: APR 1.2.1
Date Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:52:05 GMT
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 12:36:50PM +0200, Branko ─îibej wrote:
> Branko ─îibej wrote:
> >Windows compiles with lots of unnecessary warnings (looks like nobody 
> >ever tests on systems where sizeof(apr_size_t) < sizeof(apr_off_t), 

That property is certainly not unique to Windows, what are the warnings?  

> >and the tests don't pass:
> >
> >   * testfile::test_bigfprintf fails (Line 697: expected <8194>, but
> >     saw <8192>)

That one at least looks like a genuine bug, though not a regression - 
the Unix apr_file_printf() implementation was improved a while back to 
cope properly with large strings, but Win32 has a copy of the old code.

joe

Mime
View raw message