Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 5019 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2005 14:08:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2005 14:08:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 35620 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2005 14:08:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 35546 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2005 14:08:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 35528 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2005 14:08:54 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 07:08:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.155.252.72] (HELO thunderer.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.72) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 07:08:53 -0700 Received: from rcsv650.rowe-clan.net (c-24-13-128-132.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by thunderer.cnchost.com id KAA02916; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:08:42 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050706090448.0ba02eb0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:05:26 -0500 To: Joe Orton From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: [PATCH] vformatter formatting apr_status_t Cc: dev@apr.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20050705192420.GB20878@redhat.com> References: <20050705161033.GA17811@redhat.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050705135724.0a1c8340@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <20050705192420.GB20878@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 02:24 PM 7/5/2005, Joe Orton wrote: >On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:58:41PM -0500, William Rowe wrote: >> -1 on the whole %% abuse, it's is the wrong convention. > >Sorry s/%%pm/%pm/ in my message, %% is and always has been an escaped %. >I just brainoed it after writing the doxygen string which also >confusingly escapes the %s. Whoops :) In that case, +1.