Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61271 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2005 17:54:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jul 2005 17:54:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 99748 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 17:54:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 99724 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2005 17:54:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 99709 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2005 17:54:24 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:54:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [216.255.199.145] (HELO utopia.in.force-elite.com) (216.255.199.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:54:19 -0700 X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com Received: from [129.143.215.248] (129.143.215.248:50343) by utopia.in.force-elite.com with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id for from ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:54:20 -0700 Message-ID: <42DE8FCE.8030103@force-elite.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:54:22 +0200 From: Paul Querna User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brad Nicholes CC: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] APR 1.2.0 References: <42DCF9E8.1040302@force-elite.com> <42DD9C58.3235.00AC.0@novell.com> In-Reply-To: <42DD9C58.3235.00AC.0@novell.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Brad Nicholes wrote: > -1 Netware. I am having build problems because of the complicated way > that apr and apr-util build together on NetWare. The problems are > solved if we release a new apr-util as well. I had to change the way > NetWare builds the ldap portion of apr-util and without the updates that > are in trunk for apr-util, the ldap library is missing when it comes > time to link the whole thing together. > > Brad Dang, that sucks. Any idea how hard it is to fix? I do sort of consider this a show stopper to APR (and hence, for httpd). Any chance it can be fixed this week? Thanks, Paul