Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30999 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2005 19:32:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jul 2005 19:32:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 88523 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2005 19:32:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 88190 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2005 19:31:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 88176 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2005 19:31:59 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:31:59 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [24.93.47.43] (HELO ms-smtp-04.texas.rr.com) (24.93.47.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 12:31:53 -0700 Received: from [192.168.10.100] (cpe-24-27-64-6.houston.res.rr.com [24.27.64.6]) by ms-smtp-04.texas.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j6NJVsgJ019386 for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:31:54 -0500 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.2.20050722203708.074b03d0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050722172112.0721bd60@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <6.2.1.2.2.20050722203708.074b03d0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1A06F09D-6AFE-40CF-B277-5462484516A3@apache.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Curt Arnold Subject: Re: Borland/MinGW fixes Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:31:53 -0500 To: APR Developer List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Jul 22, 2005, at 8:39 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Curt, > > I'm happy to review, but can't attack till I'm on vacation. > Sympathies - yes it's taking too long to get foo reviewed lately. > > Hopefully 1.2.1 is postponed for a few days, and these are > incorporated in the next release. > > Do they apply cleanly to 0.9? Do you care? > > Bill Thanks. I haven't been concerned with 0.9, but will look at it and confirm or submit a separate patch for that branch.