apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Jen <henry...@ztune.net>
Subject Re: Recursive mutex
Date Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:44:52 GMT
Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:37:29AM -0700, Henry Jen wrote:
>>I just looked into SVN at 0.9.4(thanks Joe for pointing me there), 
>>that's pretty much what I planned to do. The trylock does not seem to be 
>>right though.
>>However, I would like to know what's wrong with that implementation and 
>>try to figure out how it can be fixed.
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/200307.mbox/%3c20030730230729.GA31874@manyfish.co.uk%3e
> and the rest of that thread probably help, I think those comments apply 
> to the code as it was before it was removed.
> I was finally motivated to throw out the old code and replace it with 
> use of POSIX recursive mutexes since doing so fixed segfaults in httpd 
> worker MPM regression tests on x86_64 with pool-debug enabled (the 
> pool-debug code is the only place inside apr/httpd where the NESTED flag 
> is used).  I don't know if those segfaults were directly attributable to 
> any of the issues I highlighted in the old code, however, just to keep 
> you on your toes ;)

Thanks, that thread helps a lot.

Our user decided to ask the Linux vendor to support recursive mutex, so 
I don't need to worry about that now. :-)

Thanks again for all the pointers.


View raw message