apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Querna <c...@force-elite.com>
Subject Rethinking apr_socket_timeout_set
Date Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:43:24 GMT
What I do not like about the current implementation is that we are 
forced to always change the socket into non-blocking on a unix platform 
to use timeouts.

This causes nasty things, like sendfile() returning EAGAIN all the time, 
because the socket is non-blocking.

I would like to look at extending the timeout API, creating a new 
version that leaves a socket in its original state (blocking or 
non-blocking), but still implements the Timeouts.  The SO_SNDTIMEO and 
O_RCVTIMEO socketopts can do exactly this.  For platforms that do not 
support them, we can emulate it but toggling to non-blocking, and using 
apr_wait_for_io_or_timeout, just like we do now, and then reseting the 
socket to its original state.

Is there any reason SO_SNDTIMEO and SO_RCVTIMEO can't be used?

Looking quickly, they seem to be supported on most unixes with the major 
exception of Solaris...



View raw message