Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50490 invoked from network); 12 May 2005 01:33:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2005 01:33:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 52530 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2005 01:37:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 52307 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2005 01:37:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 52267 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2005 01:37:27 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (HELO theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca) (142.132.65.108) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2005 18:37:27 -0700 Received: from theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j4C1TGH3009999; Wed, 11 May 2005 20:29:16 -0500 Received: from localhost (randy@localhost) by theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id j4C1TGMx009995; Wed, 11 May 2005 20:29:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 20:29:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Randy Kobes To: dev@httpd.apache.org cc: Tomcat Developers List , dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Modifying Win32 default optimizations? In-Reply-To: <428282D6.90002@xbc.nu> Message-ID: References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050511012115.07e92dd0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <42820CB3.4060907@xbc.nu> <6.2.1.2.2.20050511103700.05dfb680@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <42827A95.9080409@xbc.nu> <6.2.1.2.2.20050511164149.0653c310@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <428282D6.90002@xbc.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 12 May 2005, Branko =C4^Libej wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: [ ... ] > >Yes - I see Python 2.3 / Mod Perl 5.8 / Apache 2.0 / APR > >0.9 / etc all in the same 'generation' of code. > > > >Do you want the ASF to be a leader of this 'breakage' as > >the Python project was? This is why the push back. > > > >And I hope for Python 2.4 / Apache 2.2 / APR 2.0 / etc to > >all be of the next 'generation', finally adopting > >msvcr70. Seem rational? > > > > > I can live with that. That sounds great, but one consideration from the point of view of Perl (eg, mod_perl) is that the dominant Win32 Perl binary, from ActiveState, uses VC 6 to compile, and they don't have any plans soon of changing that. But that might change by the next generation. --=20 best regards, randy kobes