apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Curt Arnold <carn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Don't define POSIX types {p,g,u}id_t
Date Mon, 02 May 2005 07:47:26 GMT
I had hoped to work on the patch this weekend, but had an unpleasant 
distraction.

I'll try to work up a patch based on your suggestions (or a later 
consensus).


On Apr 29, 2005, at 10:14 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> At 12:43 AM 4/29/2005, Curt Arnold wrote:
>
>> Any suggestions about what to call the new type?  It can't be 
>> apr_os_proc_t since that would be a void* on Windows not the current 
>> int.
>
> apr_os_pid_t - it's not a process (_proc_t), it's a process id.
>
>> Instead of APR_DONT_DEFINE_PGUID_T, how about something more generic 
>> that indicates that we are not trying for perfectly source 
>> compatibility.  In some ways, it would be like turning the 
>> deprecation flag on in javac.
>
> APR_NODEFINE_POSIX_T
>
> (UNDEFINE implies we -undo- posix which is not what we mean.)
>
> Bill
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message