apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rici Lake <r...@ricilake.net>
Subject Re: LP64/P64 model API issue #2
Date Sat, 21 May 2005 02:04:47 GMT
On 20-May-05, at 3:45 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>
> Enough mental gymnastics, do we want (size_t) members of
> apr_table nelts values, or are we happy to have them int?
>
> Bill
>

I think int is fine. If apr_table_t were rewritten to be scalable to > 
2^31 elements, it would probably acquire a different iterator 
interface.


Mime
View raw message