apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cliff Woolley <jwool...@virginia.edu>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Don't define POSIX types {p,g,u}id_t
Date Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:10:16 GMT
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Erik Huelsmann wrote:

> But do you consider breaking programs which depend on bugs in  the APR
> implementation a bad thing?

Yes.  We are a library.  We *have to* maintain backward compatibility as
outlined by http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html.  That is the guarantee
we have made to those using our library.  Even if it means maintaining
brokenness we accidentally included.

If a program compiled on 1.0.0, it must also compile on 1.0.1.  Period.


View raw message