apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Don't define POSIX types {p,g,u}id_t
Date Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:14:01 GMT
At 12:43 AM 4/29/2005, Curt Arnold wrote:

>Any suggestions about what to call the new type?  It can't be apr_os_proc_t since that
would be a void* on Windows not the current int.

apr_os_pid_t - it's not a process (_proc_t), it's a process id.

>Instead of APR_DONT_DEFINE_PGUID_T, how about something more generic that indicates that
we are not trying for perfectly source compatibility.  In some ways, it would be like turning
the deprecation flag on in javac.


(UNDEFINE implies we -undo- posix which is not what we mean.)


View raw message