Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97367 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 16:41:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 16:41:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 938 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2005 16:41:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 825 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2005 16:41:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 792 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2005 16:41:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from outbound.mailhop.org (HELO outbound.mailhop.org) (63.208.196.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:41:36 -0800 Received: from [66.181.95.131] (helo=gideon.alum.wpi.edu) by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1DCKXW-00082z-0S; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:41:34 -0500 Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20050318113827.0286e220@mail.charter.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:41:28 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org,dev@apr.apache.org From: Greg Marr Subject: Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? In-Reply-To: <6A59038878FF133648C83BDC@[10.0.1.81]> References: <42398A5C.7000400@slive.ca> <20050317141250.GA28555@castlerea.stdlib.net.> <20050317152754.GI5790@scotch.ics.uci.edu> <20050318013331.GO5790@scotch.ics.uci.edu> <1f1d98205031808126698802b@mail.gmail.com> <6A59038878FF133648C83BDC@[10.0.1.81]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS.org X-Originating-IP: 66.181.95.131 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.org (see http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: gregmm X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 500/1000/N At 11:23 AM 3/18/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >I absolutely refuse to punish users who are using good OSes because >some OSes are brain-dead. This is exactly the role that APR is >meant to fill > >Feel free to advocate Linux always returning APR_ENOTIMPL for >sendfile - I don't care. However, blocking sendfile on non-buggy >OSes is not a solution that I am willing to sign off on. -- justin Isn't this about a change to not enable sendfile in the default HTTPd config, not a change to APR to disable sendfile? In that case, this won't affect existing HTTPd users, because they already have it enabled in their config, and the default config never replaces an existing config.