Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85039 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 19:04:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 19:04:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 73775 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2005 19:04:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 73744 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2005 19:04:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 68930 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2005 19:02:18 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Message-ID: <423B2587.3020806@web.turner.com> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:01:27 -0500 From: Brian Akins User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org CC: colm@stdlib.net, dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: do we still want sendfile enabled with our default conf files? References: <20050317141250.GA28555@castlerea.stdlib.net.> <20050317152754.GI5790@scotch.ics.uci.edu> <20050318013331.GO5790@scotch.ics.uci.edu> <1f1d98205031808126698802b@mail.gmail.com> <6A59038878FF133648C83BDC@[10.0.1.81]> <20050318163408.GA5352@castlerea.stdlib.net.> <91AF42FAD9551FF95D46DE21@[10.0.1.81]> <20050318171817.GA5562@castlerea.stdlib.net.> <89A562E993DB0B79130F4B3D@[10.0.1.81]> In-Reply-To: <89A562E993DB0B79130F4B3D@[10.0.1.81]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Friday, March 18, 2005 5:18 PM +0000 Colm MacCarthaigh > wrote: > > One fstatfs call will allow us to detect the FS issues we've seen: > either blacklist or whitelist fstypes per OS, I don't much care. And, > we can check for IPv6 sockets on Linux. As long as I can say "EnableSendfile On," and it tries to use sendfile, I don't care. I have a "stange" setup that I tested to ensure that sendfile works perfectly, so the last thing I want is APR to decide it's smarter than me and decided to turn it off when I say use it. BTW, sendfile works fine for us with linux and ipv6. I tested and turned off some offloading features of our cards. If someone doesn't want to take the time to test, then they probably don't care what APR does. As for me, if I say "on" I mean "on." -- Brian Akins Lead Systems Engineer CNN Internet Technologies