From dev-return-13924-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Thu Mar 17 19:25:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 42903 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2005 19:25:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Mar 2005 19:25:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 89761 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2005 19:25:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 89726 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2005 19:25:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 89712 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2005 19:25:35 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from leander.cnchost.com (HELO leander.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.112) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:25:34 -0800 Received: from rcsv650.rowe-clan.net (c-24-13-128-132.client.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by leander.cnchost.com id OAA27757; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:25:30 -0500 (EST) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.2.20050317131349.0336f4c0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:25:05 -0600 To: Paul Querna From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: APR-Iconv 1.0.2 Released Cc: dev@apr.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4239BB1B.50305@force-elite.com> References: <4239BB1B.50305@force-elite.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I didn't see a vote called for this release. I saw a vote amended and an extra tarball thrown out there. I have done a search against pmc@ and apr@. Justin 'amended' his +1 to include 1.0.2. Nobody else did so (some explicitly did not vote on this item). I'm explicitly voting -1 against a 1.0.2 release. Curt's issue is explicitly harmful to apr-iconv users. There is a (rather large) breakage that seems has been deliberately ignored by an overeager RM. My inclination is to pull it down from the downloads page in six hours if this is not addressed. Explanation/excuse for this announce? Bill At 11:15 AM 3/17/2005, Paul Querna wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Apache APR-Iconv 1.0.2 released >===================================== > >The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Portable Runtime Project >are proud to announce the General Availability of version 1.0.2 of the >Apache Portable Runtime Iconv Library, APR-Iconv. > >APR-Iconv is available for download from: > >~ http://apr.apache.org/download.cgi > >This is primarily a build and bug fix release. > >A detailed list of changes is at: > >~ http://www.apache.org/dist/apr/CHANGES-API > >MD5 Sums: >apr-iconv-1.0.2.tar.gz = a74e1f30d823f90fae08c9a774558d77 >apr-iconv-1.0.2.tar.bz2 = ffcfeace82581fc5fbb5709149ba887a >apr-iconv-1.0.2.tar.Z = 795fe1a987ccace2a157d4dd94aeee6c >apr-iconv-1.0.2.zip = ef90fa048c0a30dbb612d286ed5c677d >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) > >iD8DBQFCObsa94h19kJyHwARAhvOAJ9MfJi13wGrahmo9kbrPJxsT/HIdwCfV63O >WpZ9sukKTSk4L+8yBJs6dZw= >=HCgN >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----