--On Thursday, March 17, 2005 1:25 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> I have done a search against pmc@ and apr@. Justin 'amended'
> his +1 to include 1.0.2. Nobody else did so (some explicitly
> did not vote on this item).
>
> I'm explicitly voting -1 against a 1.0.2 release. Curt's issue
> is explicitly harmful to apr-iconv users. There is a (rather large)
> breakage that seems has been deliberately ignored by an overeager RM.
Paul explicitly posted a tally yesterday afternoon and you didn't bring
this up then. Nowhere can I find you saying -1 for apr-iconv, so your -1
is news to me and probably to Paul as well.
Additionally, I maintain that this isn't a regression. So, my +1 still
stands. Yes, others could have been more explicit as to what they were
voting for - but I feel Paul followed the process in good faith and should
be afforded a benefit of a doubt and not be accused of deliberately
ignoring breakage. Accusing him of malicious intent is unfair. -- justin
|