apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Bloom <rbl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: use apr for enterprise application?
Date Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:30:17 GMT
Since somebody else said it first, I will admit that APR's reliance on
pools were my absolute biggest mistake in APR.  I wrote an article for
Linux Magazine last month where I made it very clear that pools were
my biggest mistake.

My personal goal for APR 2.0 is to divorce APR from pools completely,
so that you can easily use pools if you want to, but you absolutely
aren't forced to do so.  And, it should be on a per allocation basis,
not per application.


On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:27:29 +0100, Branko ─îibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:
> Edward Rudd wrote:
> >The biggest reasons to use APR, is pool method of memory management,
> >
> >
> As a matter of fact, pools can be a huge PITA, as we've found to our
> detriment in Subversion.
> -- Brane

Ryan Bloom

View raw message