Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99628 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2005 18:34:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2005 18:34:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 42845 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2005 18:34:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 42803 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2005 18:34:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 42788 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2005 18:34:23 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from walkham.free-online.co.uk (HELO hugin.webthing.com) (80.229.52.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:34:22 -0800 Received: by hugin.webthing.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id D203E207B5; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:34:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugin.webthing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F12420797 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:34:18 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 18:34:18 +0000 (GMT) From: Nick Kew To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: APR 1.1.0 Releasee Cycle? In-Reply-To: <41E7EDE0.6090303@apache.org> Message-ID: References: <41E7EAFE.10602@force-elite.com> <41E7EC52.5070404@electricjellyfish.net> <41E7EDE0.6090303@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Mladen Turk wrote: > Garrett Rooney wrote: > > Paul Querna wrote: > >> 2. APR DBI/DBD from Nick Kew is not yet into APR-Util. I think there > >> was general agreement that this interface would be worth having, but > >> Nick is waiting to be granted karma for APR. PMC? > > > > I would like to see this in APR-Util, but I'm skeptical of just dropping > > the code into the tree and rolling a release. > > > > Why? > How to test something outside real-world anyhow. > If Nick stands behind its patch, thats more then enough for me. Well, the API has had one round of peer-review here, but the proof will be when it gets used in real-world applications by more people than just me. What I'd ideally like is for it to go into CVS for a while before becoming part of a release. -- Nick Kew