Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37556 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2005 06:23:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2005 06:23:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 14215 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2005 06:23:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 14172 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2005 06:23:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 14151 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2005 06:23:41 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from force-elite.com (HELO utopia.in.force-elite.com) (216.255.199.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:23:40 -0800 X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com Received: from [10.0.0.42] (10.0.0.42:49705) by utopia.in.force-elite.com with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id for from ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:23:37 -0800 Message-ID: <41EDFCE8.40507@force-elite.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:23:36 -0800 From: Paul Querna User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Branching 1.1.x X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N If there are no objections, I will copy APR and APR-Util trunk to ~/branches/1.1.x/ either late Thursday or Friday. Shortly afterwards I will start with 1.1.0-RC1. Trunk will become 1.2.0-dev. My only remaining concern is the stability of the LDAP Code. Are the SSL/TLS Upgrade issues resolved? Regarding APR-DBD, I agree with Nick that it would be best to get it into Subversion as soon as possible, but I do not see any reason to hold up 1.1.x for it. -Paul Querna