Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16539 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2005 16:08:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2005 16:08:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 76297 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2005 16:07:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 76191 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2005 16:07:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 76148 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2005 16:07:55 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from force-elite.com (HELO utopia.in.force-elite.com) (216.255.199.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:07:53 -0800 X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com Received: from [10.0.0.113] (10.0.0.113:60111) by utopia.in.force-elite.com with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id for from ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:07:51 -0800 Message-ID: <41E7EE58.2010404@force-elite.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:07:52 -0800 From: Paul Querna User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Rooney CC: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: APR 1.1.0 Releasee Cycle? References: <41E7EAFE.10602@force-elite.com> <41E7EC52.5070404@electricjellyfish.net> In-Reply-To: <41E7EC52.5070404@electricjellyfish.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Garrett Rooney wrote: > Paul Querna wrote: [...snip..] >> My list of issues holding up APR-1.1.0: >> >> 1. Is the APR Multicast API stable enough to keep it the same until >> APR-2.0. (I think it is, and everyone who has commented on it so far >> agrees, but it is still 'new'). > > > I would like to see some real world applications that make use of the > new API before we set it in stone. I have only been doing relatively simple test applications with this API. > (I imagine > you had some purpose in mind when you started work on them) Yes, mostly to make it easier to make something like mod_backhand for Apache 2. > Additionally it would be nice if it was implemented on a non-unix > platform, AFAIK it hasn't been yet. I believe it works on NetWare. I don't believe anyone has done the win32 bits yet. >> 2. APR DBI/DBD from Nick Kew is not yet into APR-Util. I think there >> was general agreement that this interface would be worth having, but >> Nick is waiting to be granted karma for APR. PMC? > > > I would like to see this in APR-Util, but I'm skeptical of just dropping > the code into the tree and rolling a release. What would you prefer? dropping the code into the tree and rolling a release 8 months later? -Paul