From dev-return-13489-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Wed Jan 05 15:43:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33575 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2005 15:43:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jan 2005 15:43:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 71627 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2005 15:43:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 71531 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2005 15:42:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 71488 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2005 15:42:58 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from chandler.sharp.fm (HELO chandler.sharp.fm) (64.49.223.165) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:42:29 -0800 Received: by chandler.sharp.fm (Postfix, from userid 48) id 697CA5F4DB4; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:42:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from 196.8.104.31 (SquirrelMail authenticated user minfrin@sharp.fm); by www.sharp.fm with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:42:19 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <51767.196.8.104.31.1104939739.squirrel@196.8.104.31> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:42:19 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: LDAP changes in apr-util 1.0.x From: "Graham Leggett" To: dev@apr.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-0.e3.1 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-0.e3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joe Orton said: > The apr_ldap_option.h interfaces can't be added in a 1.0.x release, 1.0.x releases must be forward and backwards source-compatible with 1.0.0 per the versioning guidelines. Ok... I will remove the patches from the apr v1.0 tree. This means that httpd v2.1.x now depends on apr v1.1.x - are there any obstacles in the way of cutting an official v1.1.0 release of APR in the next week or two? Regards, Graham --