From dev-return-13607-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Mon Jan 17 13:47:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43921 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2005 13:47:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2005 13:47:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 19544 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2005 13:47:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 19487 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2005 13:47:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 19466 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2005 13:47:11 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_POST X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from ppsw-8.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-8.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.138) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 05:47:10 -0800 Received: from mob22.robinson.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.236.230]:4603 helo=zephyr) by ppsw-8.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.138]:25) with smtp id 1CqXDj-000716-RQ (Exim 4.44) for dev@apr.apache.org (return-path ); Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:47:03 +0000 Message-ID: <001701c4fc9b$05daeae0$e6ec6f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk> From: "Max Bowsher" To: References: <49356.196.8.104.27.1105968947.squirrel@www.sharp.fm> Subject: Re: v0.9 and v1.x simultaneously - Expat conflict Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:46:22 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Graham Leggett wrote: > Hi all, > > Both v0.9 and v1.x of apr-util include a bundled copy of expat v1.95.2. > > When you try and install both the v0.9 and v1.x apr-util libraries at the > same time, a conflict results as the same expat libraries are installed > twice in the same place. > > Is it necessary to bundle expat at all? > > How would somebody doing packaging handle expat if it were bundled with > apr-util? I'd say that anyone doing packaging should be externally packaging an xml parser, and that bundled dependencies are a convenience accomdation for ad-hoc /usr/local installs. Max.