apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Querna <c...@force-elite.com>
Subject Re: Branching 1.1.x
Date Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:19:56 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>   svn cp .../trunk .../branches/1.1
> 
> Or if we decided not to use trunk, we can also
> 
>   svn cp .../tags/1.1.0 .../branches/1.1
> 

^^ that was my plan. (branches/1.1.x/)

> Given all our options with SVN, is it necessary today to
> push the trunk to any given rev number?  
 >
> On your suggestion to let 1.1.0 fly, I will do a bit of 
> comparison at the ABI level before my +1, otherwise sounds 
> great.  My only concern is the somewhat crufty .exp files 
> hacks, which I'll review tomorrow.

Thanks.

> One final commentary, is it really necessary to keep trying
> to sync version numbers of apr and apr-util?  E.g. apr-iconv
> hasn't changed, it shouldn't need a bump/release at all.

I don't think it is a requirement for minor point releases. but it makes 
sense in this case since both have had major additions/changes since 1.0.x.




Mime
View raw message