apr-dev mailing list archives

Garrett Rooney wrote:

> I don't see any reason we couldn't roll a release, although since some 
> newish stuff (like the multicast code) has recently gone in we might 
> want to consider not including that, so as to give the API more time to 
> prove itself before we set it in stone.

If we delay, then we have the six release candidates of apr v1.0 all 
over again :( As long as the API is sound the multicast stuff should be 
fine in theory, bugfixes can go into a point release.

Regards,
Graham
--