On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 11:03:57AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Friday, January 14, 2005 6:54 PM +0000 Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> >>Please look again: this is for when --link-libtool is passed, but the
> >>.la file is not present. libtool 1.5.10 does not add the RPATH in this
> >>case. Hence, linking was busted on FreeBSD without it. -- justin
> >
> >Linking what was busted? I never did understand - when is the installed
> >apr-1-config invoked at a time when libapr-1.la is not also installed
> >(the only case in which that branch would execute)?
>
> APR does not install the .la files; or, rather, GNU libtool 1.5.10 doesn't
> install them anymore. So, httpd (or svn or anything calling apr-1-config)
> does not get the correct runtime path and hence fails at runtime. -- justin
Hum, are you sure you're not just seeing some other bug here? libtool
does still install .la files, many many more things would be broken by
such a radical behaviour change... what version of FreeBSD, what is the
complete repro case, just a trunk build of everything?
joe
|