Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4101 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2004 14:45:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Dec 2004 14:45:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 99491 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2004 14:45:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 99461 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2004 14:45:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 99446 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2004 14:45:17 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Message-ID: <21103.196.8.104.37.1103293323.squirrel@196.8.104.37> In-Reply-To: <20041217140614.GB18104@redhat.com> References: <38130.196.8.104.37.1103289638.squirrel@196.8.104.37> <20041217140614.GB18104@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:22:03 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: LDAP detection in apr_ldap.h[.in] From: "Graham Leggett" To: "Joe Orton" Cc: dev@apr.apache.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-0.e3.1 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-0.e3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joe Orton said: > Yes, it's bogus, it's waiting for someone to write all the autoconf code > to support the other toolkits AFAIK. I am looking at this now (specifically to get it to work on Solaris) - the toolkit is specified in LDAP_VENDOR_NAME, which is present at compile time. I have trashed the (pending) autoconf stuff, and have used the LDAP_VENDOR_NAME macro to detect which toolkit is being used. Regards, Graham --