apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>
Subject Re: Dependencies and Modularity in APR
Date Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:53:30 GMT
Nick Kew wrote:

> This seems to me less than ideal even for DBM.   In the case of DBD,
> the backends are major applications in themselves, and hardwiring them
> at build time seems to be seriously suboptimal.  So I've re-hacked
> the DBD code to load them dynamically when APR_DSO is enabled.

(Forgive what may be a stupid question) Am I correct in assuming that 
when the platform does not support DSO, it will be built natively into 
the library as it is now? (assuming the person compiling the code has 
not indicated otherwise at compile time)


View raw message