apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: Stas's proposed symbol renames
Date Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:22:28 GMT
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 01:07:05PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Anybody cares to followup? Since no one cares I'm not sure I should be 
> doing that.

Well, since you really want feedback... ;) I often think this "naming
correctness" stuff goes too far, it just makes the API too verbose and
it can become unwieldy and ugly.  Do you genuinely get confused by the
existing names?

> Stas Bekman wrote:
> >>In view of 2), possibly 1) should be APR_FPROT_* ?
> >
> >
> >Yes, sorry, pasted it from the old proposal, here it is again:
> >
> >Let me know if I should proceed with:
> >
> >1) apr_file_permissions group:
> >
> >  APR_USETID => APR_FPROT_USETID
> >  APR_UREAD  => APR_FPROT_UREAD
> >  etc.
> >
> >2) APR_FILEPATH_* => APR_FPATH_* to be consistent with FOPEN, FINFO, 
> >FCNTL, etc.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> __________________________________________________________________
> Stas Bekman            JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
> http://stason.org/     mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
> mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
> http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org   http://ticketmaster.com

Mime
View raw message