apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: broken apr_brigade_cleanup?
Date Tue, 07 Dec 2004 17:42:32 GMT
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:27:18PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > As explained in the other reply, it's not this code that causes the crash,
> > but (maybe) the wrapper that calls it. The wrapper is autogenerated based
> > on the prototype. I have no details of the crash, I hate talking on behalf
> > of someone, when I don't know the details :( All I know is that 'access
> > violation' is reported on win32.
> >
> > Anyway, all I'm now asking is to fix the prototype. Thank you.
> Gotcha.
> It's fine with me.  I don't actually know how it would affect versioning
> rules.  It should be binary and source compatible... but then if it's
> causing crashes one way and not causing them the other, maybe it's
> actually *not* binary compatible?  *big shrug*

Yes, I think C would require that the change would not break binary
compatibility.  But it does break source compatibility, there's no way
around that.  Let's not speculate about what is causing the crashes
until that's really tracked down...


View raw message