apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: apr_sha1
Date Tue, 07 Dec 2004 14:14:36 GMT
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:32:28PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >This simply isn't a good idea until 2.0.
> 
> Does the project have a standard place to record proposed API changes for 
> the next major version so that they are not forgotten when that time comes? 
> If not, may I suggest putting this in the STATUS file under a heading like 
> "For version 2"?

I think that's a good idea, I've been collecting a diff against STATUS
for APR stuff.  There are probably already various API warts hidden away
in doxygen comments in the headers which could be collected together
too.

joe

Mime
View raw message