apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: apr_sha1
Date Tue, 07 Dec 2004 14:14:36 GMT
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:32:28PM +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >This simply isn't a good idea until 2.0.
> Does the project have a standard place to record proposed API changes for 
> the next major version so that they are not forgotten when that time comes? 
> If not, may I suggest putting this in the STATUS file under a heading like 
> "For version 2"?

I think that's a good idea, I've been collecting a diff against STATUS
for APR stuff.  There are probably already various API warts hidden away
in doxygen comments in the headers which could be collected together


View raw message