apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: apr_sha1
Date Sun, 05 Dec 2004 13:53:28 GMT
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 12:53:58PM +0000, Thom May wrote:
> Guys,
> any reason why apr_sha1_* are declared as void, and apr_md*_* are
> apr_status_t? Any objections (I have patch plus tests ready to go) for
> fixing this on HEAD?

You don't say which you propose to change, but either way it's an API
change not really worth bumping the major number for, I'd reckon. 
There's an objection to making the md5 functions return void in STATUS,
FWIW.

Regards,

joe

Mime
View raw message