Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11463 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 19:05:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 19:05:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 39400 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2004 19:05:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 39310 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2004 19:05:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 39280 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2004 19:05:20 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:05:10 -0500 (EST) From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: jcw5q@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." cc: Allan Edwards , dev@httpd.apache.org, dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.2 roadmap with respect to APR was Re: [NOTICE] CVS to SVN migration complete In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20041124124747.02ca5cd8@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Message-ID: References: <1100891614.3516.111.camel@grunt.striker.nl> <20041120014943.1507f466@parker> <20BD7D09FE72AAE1D4601067@st-augustin.ics.uci.edu> <6.1.2.0.2.20041119195907.06649ec0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <251409A8D7DA50F198EFA39D@[10.0.1.16]> <6.2.0.14.2.20041120101355.0410c4e8@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <41A20F10.6040104@wstoddard.com> <41A4D31B.6060906@us.ibm.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20041124124747.02ca5cd8@pop3.rowe-clan.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Allan - your last patches were to try to -wedge- the current > API into httpd. Can you share the patch just to fix APR? > Then we can start to comprehend scope. NO CASTS - just the > correct declarations in the first place. Since this is obviously going to be big, don't you think it would be better to just get going on a sandbox branch of APR so that we can work iteratively instead of passing big patches back and forth?