Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93842 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 21:07:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 21:07:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 13951 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2004 21:07:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 13805 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2004 21:07:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 13792 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2004 21:07:09 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Sender: kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net To: =?iso-8859-15?q?Andr=E9?= Malo Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: property cleanup References: <20041124211357.6c38df1d@parker> <85llcryp7d.fsf@newton.ch.collab.net> <20041124214216.24e2e56e@parker> From: kfogel@collab.net Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net Emacs: if it payed rent for disk space, you'd be rich. Date: 24 Nov 2004 15:05:18 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20041124214216.24e2e56e@parker> Message-ID: <85zn17x8j5.fsf@newton.ch.collab.net> Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Andr=E9 Malo writes: > > Any reason to delete the property? Even if the keywords aren't there > > now, someone may put them there later. >=20 > Because (a) explicit is better than implicit, (b) we don't use much keywo= rds > by policy and (c) I love clean stuff ;-) >=20 > (there's also a minor performance improvement on the client side...) Okay, I'm persuaded :-).