apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Allan Edwards <a...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: 2.2 roadmap with respect to APR was Re: [NOTICE] CVS to SVN migration complete
Date Thu, 25 Nov 2004 02:40:19 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 01:29 PM 11/24/2004, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>>On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>I'm sick of all talk and no action.  We tried this last year when we were
>>"almost" ready to branch APR 1.0 and all action on that front ceased
>>entirely for a YEAR.  This time it's one or the other.  I'll wait 24 hours
>>at most to hear opinions.  Whichever route gets the most support wins.
>>So far we have:
>> trunk remains 1.1, 64-bit is sandboxed:
>>    jwoolley, jerenkrantz
>       wrowe: (conditional on committing to head once it's reviewed,
>               and branch 1.1 if we want to keep 1.1 alive.)

That is fine by me. I agree that the extent of the
changes will probably be significant so at least starting
with a sandbox branch may be judicious, at least until we
get a feel for the extent of the changes, and working on
a branch may actually help accelerate the work.


View raw message