apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Garrett Rooney <roo...@electricjellyfish.net>
Subject Re: 2.2 roadmap with respect to APR was Re: [NOTICE] CVS to SVN migration complete
Date Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:24:36 GMT
Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> 
> 
>>I guess I'm just arguing for a single branch that's the target of the
>>current development, as opposed to one 64 bit dev branch and one trunk
>>which holds other changes, thus requiring us to either invest constant
>>effort in merging changes from the trunk into the 64 bit branch or
>>letting it get kind of stale and then having a mega-huge merge into the
>>trunk at the end.
> 
> 
> The only question is whether we want to keep trunk as 1.1-dev or 2.0-dev.
> But I guess with SVN it's easy to branch 1.1 and 1.0 off of what's now the
> 1.0 branch (rename the 1.0 branch to 1.1 and branch a new 1.0 branch off
> of that, or whatever).

Exactly.

> So sure, screw it.  APR trunk is now 2.0-dev.  Have fun.

The only thing we need to be sure of is publicising this fact to our 
consumers.  People are probably used to being able to check out trunk 
and get the 1.x API, so if we're planning on changing the API we need to 
make it clear that those people need to be using the 1.0.x branch.

-garrett

Mime
View raw message