apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Stoddard <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: 2.2 roadmap with respect to APR was Re: [NOTICE] CVS to SVN migration complete
Date Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:08:48 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> At 08:23 AM 11/20/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Nov 20, 2004, at 12:03 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>
>>>So, my opinion is that we let Allen branch apr off now and let him go at it at
a measured pace, but we shouldn't intend to hold httpd 2.2 for that.  -- justin
>>
>>+1. Of course, I am assuming that his 64bit fixes will likely
>>break binary compatibility. 
> 
> 
> It does - that's the rub.  And, for 2.2, this was always the plan.

And that's precisely the reason we should attack the 64 bit problem for 2.2. This will give
the 2.2 series a 
much longer life than if we push off the 64 bit work to 2.4.


Bill

Mime
View raw message