apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Max Bowsher" <m...@ukf.net>
Subject Re: Stas's proposed symbol renames
Date Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:57:50 GMT
Stas Bekman wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Now that 1.0.x is branched, svn is up and running and most
>> of the headaches are diminishing with the help of a bit
>> of advil...
>> 
>> I see no reason for Stas not to commit his APR_ file macro
>> renames on 1.1.x - it's commit-then-review so be my guest.
> 
> I've committed to 1.1 the renames fopen defines (APR_READ, APR_WRITE,
> etc.) to have prefix APR_FOPEN_ (keeping the old defines)
> 
> Let me know if I should proceed with:
> 
> 1) apr_file_permissions group:
> 
>   APR_USETID => APR_FILEPROT_USETID
>   APR_UREAD  => APR_FILEPROT_UREAD
>   etc.
> 
> 2) APR_FILEPATH_* => APR_FPATH_* to be consistent with FOPEN, FINFO,
> FCNTL, etc.


In view of 2), possibly 1) should be APR_FPROT_* ?

Max.


Mime
View raw message