apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Max Bowsher" <m...@ukf.net>
Subject Re: APR 1.0.0 and CYGWIN
Date Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:47:25 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Daniel,
>
>  we really shouldn't be building unix/ on cygwin.  In spite
> of the built-in support, it simply hasn't been vetted and is
> bound to have vulnerabilities if used for Apache 2.0.
>
>  Ideally we should modify the configure.in for cygwin to
> determine win32/ as the build sources, and toggle -DWIN32.
> There are probably other side effects, but I'd be happy to
> help you work through them if you would like to help us
> put together a patch.
>
>  In many cases (see the file lists in the .dsp win32 build
> files) we zig-zag between win32/ and unix/ in the same tree,
> and need to see how to do so effectively for cygwin.
>
>  If we do this right, the same sources should build on both
> cygwin and mingw.

Please please discuss this on the cygwin mailing lists before going down 
this course.

Cygwin is supposed to be unix-like. Packages shouldn't need to start 
applying win32 specific tricks, and when they do, it often compromizes the 
unix-like feel that is a major feature of Cygwin.

Max.


Mime
View raw message