From dev-return-12797-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Wed Sep 15 21:05:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1627 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2004 21:05:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2004 21:05:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 46837 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2004 21:05:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 46791 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2004 21:05:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 1256 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2004 07:15:15 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of carl@bl.echidna.id.au designates 203.6.241.134 as permitted sender) Message-ID: <4147EBF9.8040307@bl.echidna.id.au> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:15:05 +1000 From: Carl Brewer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Orton CC: MGorbunov@imbank.ru, dev@apr.apache.org, Ken Simpson , modperl@perl.apache.org, Stas Bekman Subject: Re: [mp2] NetBSD-1.6.2 modperl 1.99_16 httpd 2.0.51-dev make test errors References: <20040909084427.GB32244@redhat.com> <20040914205203.GA13887@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040914205203.GA13887@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on rollcage2.bl.echidna.id.au X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on rollcage2.bl.echidna.id.au X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joe Orton wrote: > Oh well, having found a NetBSD box to testd this myself, the NetBSD > fcntl() is being economical with the truth. It doesn't return > O_NONBLOCK yet the socket really is non-blocking. I'll put in the > suggested apr_hints.m4 change. fun fun This may be worth bringing to the attention of the NetBSD core team, as there's a 2.0 release coming up pretty soon, it may be a bugfix worth including.