Max Bowsher wrote:
> Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> At 09:05 PM 9/17/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>>> At 06:54 PM 9/17/2004, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> So any objecttions to the s/APR_/APR_FILETYPE_/ rename?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Veto - defer for 2.0
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't object to the new names, but find it pretty absurd
>>> to start deprecating interfaces the month we roll out 1.0.
>>
>>
>> You mean, I've missed the train?
>>
>> Well, we are about to freeze the mod_perl 2 API, and we would like to
>> have
>> non-ambiguous constants. So I'm not sure how to proceed from here.
>
>
> Well, the APR_ namespace is non-ambiguously APR's, and APR itself can
> ensure sanity within that namespace - what more is required?
>
> Personally, I think it's good that APR's constant names aren't
> needlessly bloated in length.
What's exactly APR itself? You mean it can look in the mirror and smile at
how beautiful it is? And never leave the house?
APR can be judged by how useful it is in the projects it's used. It's
useless on its own.
--
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
|