Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:49:17 -0700
From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com>
To: David Reid <david@jetnet.co.uk>, dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: RC5
Message-ID: <C50A06A4B07C61823588DFC2@[10.0.1.8]>
In-Reply-To: <4117AA82.60109@jetnet.co.uk>
References: <411761A2.4070600@jetnet.co.uk>
 <10CC0642A21135530B932CA2@[10.0.1.8]> <4117AA82.60109@jetnet.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

--On Monday, August 9, 2004 5:46 PM +0100 David Reid <david@jetnet.co.uk> 
wrote:

>> patch - but users of the tarball won't likely be running buildconf.  [If
>> you wanted, you could include the new find_apr.m4 in 1.0 - your call.]
>
> OK. Which version is the one I should be including?

I *believe* r1.16 of build/find_apr.m4 should be okay.  However, I'd like to 
see some other people verify that it works now.  (It worked here with autoconf 
2.13.)

> Well, the way things are going I'd suggest that getting those changes into
> apr-util should be a priority. I'd look but haven't been too involved with
> it all.

I'll *try* to take a look later today...

> I debated that, but to be honest once we release 1.0.0 any momentum we have
> (what very little there remains) will dissipate very quickly - so let's go
> for all on the same day.

Understood.  -- justin