From dev-return-12548-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Mon Aug 09 11:34:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45251 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 11:34:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 11:34:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 53551 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2004 11:34:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 53483 invoked by uid 500); 9 Aug 2004 11:34:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 53364 invoked by uid 99); 9 Aug 2004 11:34:17 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Message-ID: <411761A2.4070600@jetnet.co.uk> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 12:36:02 +0100 From: David Reid User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: RC5 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jetnet.co.uk X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N So, apart from the complaints about apr-util, are people happy that apr RC5 is OK? Are those who wanted the ldap code yanked now happy that it can be added back in? david