apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Allan Edwards <a...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: Windows 2003 IA64 builds?
Date Thu, 19 Aug 2004 20:26:06 GMT
Joe Orton wrote:
> w.r.t. common code, depends what the changes are; if there are places
> where an int is used to store the difference between pointers, it's
> probably a good and safe change to make that an apr_ssize_t instead.

Yes, there are a few of those, they are the easy ones to fix :)

> w.r.t. warnings: yes, gcc is just less picky.  But Win64 has a 32-bit
> long, right?  

That's correct, but that actually contributes to a fairly low % of warnings

>>+                rv = collapse_iovec((char**) &ptfb->Tail, (apr_size_t 
>>*)&ptfb->TailLength,
> 
> if that's casting (int *) to (size_t *) that looks dangerous.

Will take another look at that. I'm offline for the next 3 days but hope to
pick it up again next Monday.

Thanks
Allan


Mime
View raw message