apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: RC5
Date Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:50:28 GMT
David Reid wrote:

> So, apart from the complaints about apr-util, are people happy that 
> apr RC5 is OK?
>
> Are those who wanted the ldap code yanked now happy that it can be 
> added back in?
>
> david
>
Here is what I'm getting trying to compile the latest HEAD on WIN32:
Creating apr_ldap.h from apr_ldap.hw
Compiling...
apr_ldap_url.c
ldap\apr_ldap_url.c(286) : warning C4013: 'apr_pstrdup' undefined; 
assuming extern returning int
ldap\apr_ldap_url.c(672) : warning C4013: 'apr_strtok' undefined; 
assuming extern returning int
apr_ldap_init.c
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(199) : warning C4090: 'function' : different 
'const' qualifiers
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : warning C4013: 'const_cast' undefined; 
assuming extern returning int
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : error C2065: 'ldc' : undeclared identifier
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : error C2223: left of '->host' must point to 
struct/union
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : warning C4047: 'function' : 'PCHAR' differs 
in levels of indirection from 'int'
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : error C2223: left of '->port' must point to 
struct/union
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : error C2198: 'ldap_sslinit' : too few 
arguments for call through pointer-to-function

So, if the latest ldap sources are going to be in the 1.0, then they  
need some fixes.

Regards,
MT. 


Mime
View raw message