apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: RC5
Date Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:46:03 GMT
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 08:18:51AM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 16:05 +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 12:36:02PM +0100, David Reid wrote:
> > > So, apart from the complaints about apr-util, are people happy that apr 
> > > RC5 is OK?
> > 
> > +1, RC5 looks good to me.  testall passes in both apr and apr-util on
> > RHEL3/{amd64,i686,ppc}, {RHEL2.1,FC1}/x86.  If you roll an RC6 then
> > please pick up apr/test/testpoll.c:r1.34 which is needed to get the
> > tests to pass with the epoll-based poll backend on a 2.6 kernel.
> 
> I thought the apr_pollset changes that add EPoll and KQueue support were
> not part of 1.0?

Hmmm, well, they are in there, but CHANGES is out of synch, so one of
those things should be changed, I've no particular preference which. 
Having CHANGES list 1.1 changes in the 1.0.0 tarball looks a bit odd
still.

joe

Mime
View raw message