apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Bloom <rbl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 1.0
Date Mon, 09 Aug 2004 22:05:33 GMT
The chances that I have time to look at this are slim to none
currently.  My time is currently being swallowed by my job and my real


On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:52:27 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> At 02:46 PM 8/9/2004, malc wrote:
> >No, but i would guess taking some tests from GLIBC and/or Win32 Pthreads
> >would do, as APIs are quite similar. As for patches, current condition
> >variable code is broken beyond repair, the whole aproach can't possibly
> >work. There is at least one algorithm that does work and thats the one
> >in Win32 Pthreads. I do not have enough expertise in this field to
> >contribute any patches tests, i'm not even a Win32 coder.
> Unfortunately, since everything you just mentioned is GPL, afaik,
> it's worthless to us.  I'll review from a logical perspective.
> Threads and the proposed threading patch I grok (and accept :),
> while condition variables I'm less familiar with.  Perhaps Bannert,
> Bloom and some other condition variable gurus will pipe up.
> Bill

Ryan Bloom

View raw message