Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18683 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2004 21:55:50 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Jul 2004 21:55:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 78958 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2004 21:56:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 78923 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2004 21:56:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 78910 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2004 21:56:06 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 22:55:36 +0100 From: Joe Orton To: APR Development Subject: Re: apr-config and apr-1-config Message-ID: <20040701215536.GC20030@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: APR Development References: <40E47DC1.2020507@sharp.fm> <20040701213633.GB19939@redhat.com> <40E48608.4060205@sharp.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40E48608.4060205@sharp.fm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:45:44PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > > >>I've noticed that the most recent CVS of 1.0.0 installs both > >>/usr/bin/apr-config, and /usr/bin/apr-1-config. Is this intentional? > > >Yes, for the moment. > > How do you suggest the RPM should handle this? - at the moment > installing a v0 RPM and a v1 RPM simultaneously will cause a conflict. > Should we just leave it as is for now? Yes, just leave it for the moment I guess. joe