From dev-return-12418-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Thu Jul 22 19:42:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9171 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2004 19:42:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2004 19:42:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 123 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2004 19:42:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 99907 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2004 19:42:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 99766 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2004 19:42:16 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Message-ID: <41001876.1060706@wstoddard.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:41:42 -0400 From: Bill Stoddard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/win32 sendrecv.c sockets.c References: <20040722014835.85452.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Thursday, July 22, 2004 7:30 AM -0400 Jeff Trawick > wrote: > >> On a slightly more interesting note, I committed something to APR HEAD >> a few days ago and was faced with the question "darn, under what APR >> release number do I put the CHANGES entry?"... I put it under 1.0, >> and if some subsequent 1.0 tarball doesn't include it I guess we need >> a new entry for 1.0.1. Does anybody know the right answer? > > > Let the RM fix it. ;-) > That was my exact thought. Bill