apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH APR 1.0] crtime v.s. intime
Date Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:21:33 GMT
Ping list - 12 days elapsed.  No interest?  Only comment was from Branko, 
and not in response to this patch.

Since we've floated about this for a year with only a few interested parties
- I suppose it's time to kill the proposal and just document the inconsistency.

Attached are two patches, one introduces intime/crtime (I missed adding 
the actual apr_time_t intime member in the last patch - this fixes it.)
The doc_fix patch just documents the deficiency.  Let's pick one or the other.

Bill

At 03:06 PM 7/2/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>Here's the patch for those interested, which splits ctime into crtime
>and intime.
>
>An interesting side effect, neither crtime nor intime stay part of the
>APR_FINFO_MIN set of information - one bit or the other would be
>toggled.


Mime
View raw message