apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <br...@xbc.nu>
Subject Re: apr_finfo_t ctime field
Date Thu, 01 Jul 2004 23:28:43 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

>As we approach APR 1.0
>is it time to address the ambiguity between ctime, which is actually the
>inode file time stamp for unix, and the creation time stamp for win32?
>Persisting either ctime will propogate the confusion, I suggest splitting
>them into intime and crtime.  Opinions?
>I'll offer an APR 1.0 patch tommorow based on feedback.
Yes, yes, yes. Sorry I didn't notice this before. This would be a very 
good change.

-- Brane

View raw message